Re: Cannot find valid baseurl for rpmfusion repo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/29/2012 08:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 29.06.2012 17:08, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
>> On 06/29/2012 03:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> where is any single benfit in creating a local repo
>>> to put the one-shot RPMs compared between
>>>
>>> "yum install localfile.rpm"
>>> or
>>> "yum install --nogpgcheck localfile.rpm"
>>>
>>> ????
>>>
>>> there is no difference from any point of view
>>>
>>>
>> I then find it puzzling that you're having problems
> i find it puzzling that you believe i have problems
> how comes? my systems are working since many years
> on many many fedora setups and a local repo was never
> a solution for anything

Well that doesn't mean it never will be, does it? I use a shared local
repo on my LAN so I can update multiple machines without downloading the
same RPMs multiple times.

>
>> the method I outlined worked for me on both Fedora 16 and Fedora 17
> which does not mean that the overhead of your method
> has any benefit

Have you even tried it?

>
>> Apparently there is something different with
>> your method, and it causes you a problem for 
>> reasons I don't know, 
> again: how comes that you think i have any sproblem?

You do have a problem, an invalid url in a yum configuration for
RPMFusion when trying to configure using the supplied
setup RPM

>
>> so perhaps trying a different method can't do any harm surely
> knowing how yum and rpm is working is enough to qualify
> snakeoil like a local repo to solve "no valid baseurl"
> for a remote repo as useless

How does a local repo qualify has snakeoil? You appear to be quick to
dismiss it for what I consider very flimsy reasoning that in reality
amounts to your preferred methods.

>From what I can gather that failed url came about by using yum and the
RPM supplied by RPMFusion

Well I have had no url problem by using the RPMFusion supplied for
Fedora 16/17 x64 configuration RPM and you have.  It also appears that
this does not appear to be a problem for the vast majority of users. So
what harm is there in trying a different approach?

It is certainly possible the RPM you downloaded has been corrupted, and
if it was a problem from RPMFusion I think many more people would be
having your url problem.

If all else fails RPMFusion provides links to their repositories, as
well as the required urls so you could set them up manually.

Well, all the best, and I hope you resolve the problem, and better still
discover what caused it.

cpp4ever

>
>
>


-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux