On 05/18/2012 10:35 AM, JD wrote:
On 05/18/2012 10:22 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/18/2012 12:22 AM, JD wrote:
I think that's more tolerable than
having to wait anywhere from 10 to 30 seconds to resolve every
new name browsed to; (new relative to contents of the cache).
If the name isn't in your cache, you're going to have to look it up
and using a longer TTL isn't going to change the lookup time one
little bit. What it will do is keep recent addresses in the cache
longer so that you won't have to look them up so often.
Not so.
If I could make them live in my local cache a little longer,
lookup will be in ms rather than seconds.
Read what I wrote again, more carefully. If the site's new, and NOT IN
YOUR CACHE, the TTL doesn't matter. This only means that sites you've
been to recently stay in the cache longer, which isn't the same thing.
Yes, I agree that they should hang around long enough to be useful but
what I was pointing out is that it's not going to help on a NEW site, as
you were saying.
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org