On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Gordon Messmer <yinyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have switched to dnsmasq and so far, it is not too bad.
Albeit, it's cache purge algorithm seems to have a very
short ttl for any translation - like about 3 to 5 minutes!!!
I looked for a configuration in dnsmasq.conf that would
force dnsmasq to keep a translation for a longer time in
it's tables. I have not found it, or I must be going blind :)
On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, JD wrote:
That's excellent info. contradicts what other people have replied.
I also meant to point out that if you select nscd rather than a local caching server, you don't need 127.0.0.1 in resolv.conf. glibc connects to nscd via a Unix socket rather than via IP. The same is true of sssd on newer releases of Fedora. (nscd is, I believe, deprecated by Fedora in favor of sssd).
--
I have switched to dnsmasq and so far, it is not too bad.
Albeit, it's cache purge algorithm seems to have a very
short ttl for any translation - like about 3 to 5 minutes!!!
I looked for a configuration in dnsmasq.conf that would
force dnsmasq to keep a translation for a longer time in
it's tables. I have not found it, or I must be going blind :)
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org