Am 22.03.2012 18:37, schrieb Claude Jones: > in other words, in can start services up in parallel, instead of waiting > for each one to initiate before going to the next... what can have the opposite effect if the disk is slow and services are producing much disc activity at start on most machines it will improve boot performance, but not on all also the parallel start brings a lot of other troubles if a bundle of services depends on each other started in the right order and full working and systemd introduces RANDOm here because it will not start services each time in the exactly same order however, if fedora would have done the systemd transition much cleaner most troubles would have been much less, but i doubt it will take years with the current policies to get rid of this damned sysv-scipts which are still present
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
