Re: ...kernel module signing on x86??? Why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/3/10 Joel Rees <joel.rees@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Joshua C. <joshuacov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2012/3/9 Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>> So you can stop a third party tampering with the modules on your system,
>>> while keeping the ability to do so yourself. It's all about who owns the
>>> keys. If you own the keys it becomes a useful security feature to some
>>> users.
>>>
>>> Alan
>>
>> Put in other words: You cannot do anything with the distro-realeased
>> modules because they should be signed. If the distro key is "publicly"
>> available then any third party can use it and sign his modules.
>> So I have to recompile the whole kernel (all modules inclusive) and
>> resign them with my own key so that only I can temper with them. In
>> both cases I need to recomplie the kernel once again... just for
>> nothing.
>>
>> Honestly I think  this is an extra burden for the developers/people
>> who modifiy often their kernels.
>>
>> --joshua
>
> Another case of making things harder than they should be so that
> ordinary people won't jump through the hoops, but more so that the
> people with the money to sue with can use the threat of lawsuits
> against the people who would dare act independently. As long as the
> DMCS stands, people are going to keep re-inventing things to add
> patented and copyrighted junk in an effort to force as many people as
> possible into their revenue stream.
>
> Waste the world away building a society of plenty, then lock it down
> with artificial scarcity. So that they think they can make everyone
> pay them to tell them what to do. Demigods and IP demagogues.
>
> --
> Joel Rees
> --

In my view this patch is a sign of a comming burden to the linux kernel.

I hope the developers reconsider the decision to put extra "locks"
where they are not needed at all.


-- 

-- joshua
-- 
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux