> I fully agree with you but the question is "Why should we do this on > linux?" Let the windoof people do whatever they want... You see that > the module signing is more a less a measure against the so called > "windows OEM-SLP activation with modded bootloaders". I don't see any > benefit for linux but an extra burden to have to find ways to unlock > this bogus 'secure boot' stuff. So you can stop a third party tampering with the modules on your system, while keeping the ability to do so yourself. It's all about who owns the keys. If you own the keys it becomes a useful security feature to some users. Alan -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
