On 18 April 2011 22:46, JD <jd1008@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/18/2011 02:21 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote: >> On 18 April 2011 21:58, JD<jd1008@xxxxxxxxx> Âwrote: >>> On 04/18/2011 11:46 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: >>>> On 04/18/2011 09:22 AM, JD wrote: >>>>> But the OP seems not to have taken this road :) >>>> And wisely, IMO. ÂNot because it's not a good idea but because doing >>>> that would require him to trust the hosting company, and I think they've >>>> already proven themselves to be untrustworthy. ÂMoving to a new company >>>> (and making sure that this time the contract *requires* them to install >>>> a more current OS) is probably his safest option at this point. >>> Even so, see as Fedora becomes "OLD" in about >>> a 18 to 36 months, what hosting company is going to agree to update the >>> system? >>> Not very many! >> The good ones? > "good ones" as in "$$$$$$" per year? :) Two familiar adages: 1) You get what you pay for. 2) There's no such thing as a free lunch. I use Slicehost and Rackspace Cloud - they are both very reasonably priced... -- Sam -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
