On 04/18/2011 11:46 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 04/18/2011 09:22 AM, JD wrote: >> But the OP seems not to have taken this road :) > And wisely, IMO. Not because it's not a good idea but because doing > that would require him to trust the hosting company, and I think they've > already proven themselves to be untrustworthy. Moving to a new company > (and making sure that this time the contract *requires* them to install > a more current OS) is probably his safest option at this point. Even so, see as Fedora becomes "OLD" in about a 18 to 36 months, what hosting company is going to agree to update the system? Not very many! A second drive solutions is the best solution regardless of the hosting company. JD -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
