It was Fedora v6. RHEL was not offered as an OS option. On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Andy Blanchard <zocalo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 18 April 2011 13:48, Tom Horsley <horsley1953@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:07:33 +0100 >> Dave Cross wrote: >> >> > What kind of hosting company installs an operating system that has >> > been unsupported for three years? >> >> One that has been in business for about 3 years and has just >> been copying the original fedora 6 image they setup when >> they started using the rote procedures the consultant they >> hired at that time created? >> > > This may be a dumb question, but since it hasn't actually come up yet... > Are we *certain* the hosting company in question installed Fedora v6 and not > the current release (also v6) of Red Hat Enterprise Linux? > > IIRC Fedora was still under the Red Hat banner at v6, so this could be a > simple mix up by a sales droid or some other communication SNAFU. > Especially so since RHN might be a much more appealing way of managing a > large number of installs than rolling their own solution on Fedora for a web > hosting company... > > What does the command "cat /etc/redhat-release" return? > > -- > Andy > > The only person to have all his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe > > -- > users mailing list > users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
