On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:14 PM, <homburg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:14:46 -0600 > "Arthur Pemberton" <pemboa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > OK, but I think we agree that there are lots of >> > features missing from KDE4 that 3.5 had. The global >> > menu bar comes to mind. Kasbar. Those are the ones I >> > immedately remember, but the Controlpanel has been >> > severely cut down (if only for the time being). >> > >> > This is what drove me away from it (again, for the time >> > being). /W >> >> >> Yes, I was a bit worried when I heard that KControlCenter >> was going away. but the replacement is much better >> aesthetically and functionally at least. >> >> > When I used the phrase (in quotes) "experienced user" it > was euphemistic for older user. I am sure that KDE4 is > great for some people. I prefer the arrangement and scheme > of the 3.5x panel. > > KDE describes the choice as follows: > > "KDE 4.1 (recommended for early-adopting users)" > "KDE 3.5 is the more mature version of KDE. For more > conservative users, this is the recommended version > of KDE." And we are in Fedora. Which is more likely? I'm not trying to degrade your choice of KDE 3.5. I'm just trying to show you that just expecting the worker of bees to choose the one you prefer is a optimistic at best. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
