> 1. I don't want to start a KDE food fight. I suspect that > it's a generational thing. In any event, I would think that > enough interest exists in the 3.5x "branch" to reconsider > including it on the install media. How many people are > installing "Sugar?" I have personally installed Sugar to play with it and I find it very amusing and nice. Plus, I get to report bugs once in a while if I find any. > Again, I am not knocking KDE4. However, it is a radical > departure from something that I have been using since RH-9, > possibly earlier. Ummm...to me, KDE 4.1 seems quite stable at this point, and has most of the features an average user would need. That's just what I think though. > 2. The release notes: "This is to support gdm no longer > allowing the root user to log in to the graphical desktop." > > While this is consistent with best practices and can be > changed by editing the file in pam.d, it just seems to me > that Fedora should not be making this decision for users. > Particularly on the first boot into a new system, some find > it very advantageous to log in as root. It's really up to > the end user to determine their threshold for risk > tolerance. I would have to agree with that! -- Armin Past is history, Tomorrow is a mystery, But today is a gift. That's why it's called, present. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
