Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gordon Messmer wrote:

In accepting it's terms you give up your freedom to distribute any part of the work under different terms, including any of your own that you might want to add.

Since you never had any such freedom under copyright law, you aren't giving anything up.

That makes no sense. You do have the freedom and right to license your own work under any terms you want. You do have the freedom and right to redistribute other works under other licenses, free or with other arrangements. But you must give up your freedom and rights or you are unable to participate in distributing these things as part of a work that contains any GPL-covered material.

You don't have just have 'permission' to redistribute under GPL terms, you have a mandate not to distribute any part of the whole under any other terms. It's not unilateral - you must give up your freedom.

I don't believe that to actually be the case. You've repeatedly insisted that the GPL replaces other license's terms, but I believe that you are mistaken.

In the case of a fully dual-licensed work, you would be able to use the terms of the other license and ignore the GPL. In the case of a combination, where any part of the work is strictly-GPL you will be required to accept the GPL terms to do anything copyright would prohibit. And I see no possible way to accept the terms of the GPL on anything less than the work-as-a-whole as specificied in section 2b.

If you take Project X, distributed under the GPL, and implement feature A under a BSD license, when you distribute your improved version, the GPL protects the users by guaranteeing them all of the rights covered by the GPL. That is, you may not impose additional restrictions on their use or redistribution of your improved version of Project X.

But the point is that you also cannot impose fewer restrictions, or different restrictions, or no restrictions on the component you add or include from an existing less restricted project. This component can exist on its own with other terms, but becomes encumbered by the GPL in situations where you are required to accept that license on any part of the work.

This is what Alexandre is referring to as "power"; if you placed additional restrictions on your users, you would be exerting a kind of power granted by copyright law and restricting their freedom.

It is not freedom, it is a restriction itself.

However, the GPL does not replace the terms of your license on your code. If you grant users redistribution rights to the source code for feature A under a BSD license, then those users may use *that source code* in any way that's allowed by your license. They can't use the entire work under your more permissive license, but they can use the source code that *you* wrote, as governed by *your* license.

Please point out any exception you can find to section 2b. Or how you can 'unaccept' the terms the GPL specifies once you have accepted them.

Do you see, now, how the "work as a whole" clause does not replace the terms of your license?

No, I don't see that. I see no way to accept any GPL terms other that the way it specifies - covering the work as a whole. If you could, you could as easily include proprietary components with different licenses and ignore the terms on that part.

The terms of your license will always apply to your code, and no other license can change that under copyright law. The GPL's terms must only be met when distributing the combined work.

Accepting the GPL terms is what you must do to be permitted to distribute or anything prohibited by copyright. But then there is no provision for unaccepting it while you do something it wouldn't permit to some part of the work. At that point you've agreed that you wouldn't.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux