Les Mikesell wrote:
That should be the upstream author's designation, shouldn't it? Does
the mozilla group still even admit that firefox 1.5 exists? What
about the beta dovecot that was shipped in RHEL4 and never updated to
the release version? Complaints about the old bugs kept showing up in
the upstream mailing list years after the stable release, confusing
everyone.
Wait, wait, wait. You were complaining about Fedora being too far ahead
and being unstable, and now you're knocking RHEL for being too far
behind? What exactly do you want?
I'm starting to think that the guys who said you simply want a distro
custom-tailored to your exact specs are right. What would satisfy you,
a distro with all the latest versions that doesn't have any bugs in it
or something?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
