Hi,
I mean that as opposed to having logical reasons or evidence to back
them up.
What exactly needs 'proving' ? Fedora have decided, for better or worse,
to take the path they have. They don't need to justify that choice to
anyway. Whether they get (or keep) any users is justification enough.
What you believe is fine, I have some sympathy for your view point. My
point is Fedora has placed itself at a particular niche in the linux
distro landscape that doesn't match your wishes. I applaud Fedora for
the semi-radical stance they take and believe we need a distro out
there like that. As much as I believe we need a distro like ubuntu.
To whatever extent this fragments the installed base and makes it
difficult for 3rd party software to run across the variations it works
against the general acceptability of Linux and hurts everyone. We are
just continuing the old unix flavor wars that gave Microsoft an easy
monopoly and ensuring that things can't change.
Anti-septic hurts, but in the long run it helps cure problems. Fedora (I
believe) are promoting what in the long term is the right way to go
(IMHO). Time will tell if it is truly the correct approach(/treatment).
Chris
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
