Les Mikesell wrote:
Todd Denniston wrote:
And there is nothing about the hostility to outside software.
I don't think it is so much hostility as ambivalence.
OK, if you describe fedora as 'user ambivalent', it at least makes the
need for ubuntu to exist very clear.
I prefer the original definition which was effectively 'non-OSS, binary
kernel blob and alike ambivalent' - You may disagree but many people,
and I think Fedora in general, considers this to be good for the user,
in the long run.
Ubuntu takes a different view point on what is good for the user, which
seems to match yours better. I personally think we need both view
points, and trying to suggest Fedora should become more like Ubuntu is a
bad idea which will never happen.
Chris
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
