On Nov 9, 2007 4:05 AM, Timothy Murphy <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > >> Actually, I'm not going to continue this discussion. I wanted > >> just to share my thoughts. I know that I'm not alone. For > >> example, here > >> http://www.oreillynet.com/linux/blog/2007/03/where_fedora_went_wrong.html > >> is also said enough, on both sides. And my opinion is that > >> Fedora will only win if testing period and release lifetime > >> will be at least twice longer. > ... > > That aside, it seems that you are in the minority. Most of us > > (currently) here are quite comfortable with how things are. > > How do you know? > Have you some feedback on this? It seems a logical conclusion. If he was in the majority, then fedora would have a long "support" lifetime. 6 months is the time frame those doing the heavy lifting felt would be best to keep things up to date, but not falling apart. So reiterate... how do I know? Simple, it isn't so. If there is a large majority of people who want a long real cycle, they best get to work and contribute the necessary resources to get that done - but then you'll be leaving out those of us who like the short lifetimes. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
