Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> Actually, I'm not going to continue this discussion. I wanted >> just to share my thoughts. I know that I'm not alone. For >> example, here >> http://www.oreillynet.com/linux/blog/2007/03/where_fedora_went_wrong.html >> is also said enough, on both sides. And my opinion is that >> Fedora will only win if testing period and release lifetime >> will be at least twice longer. ... > That aside, it seems that you are in the minority. Most of us > (currently) here are quite comfortable with how things are. How do you know? Have you some feedback on this? I don't necessarily agree with the OP, but he seemed to me to ask a perfectly sensible question, and basically was told to stuff it. There must be some rational reason for choosing 6 months. Why not 6 years, or 6 minutes? I have been running the Fedora-8 KDE Live CD (on a USB stick) since last night, with no problems at all. [The only difficulty was that it required a last-minute update of F-7 livecd-tools, which I had not actually installed.] But at first glance F-8 doesn't look to me significantly different to F-7 with updates. So it is not entirely clear to me that it was actually worth putting out a new distribution in this case (unlike F-6 and F-7, where there seemed to be major changes). However, I may be talking nonsense, as I haven't looked closely at F-8. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
