Re: Fedora - DELL ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Les Mikesell wrote:
Andy Green wrote:

This problem: ''It's Linux that brings a problem into this picture.'' Mentioned after your noting that Dells ship with MP3 and WMA and "It's Linux that brings a problem into this picture.". The reason Linux distros don't ship with that support is patents. I hope that clears up your sudden attack of 'confusion'.

No, it doesn't clear it up, given that other operating systems are able to arrange distribution with patented components. I'm not insisting that this combination be free, just available.

For Microsoft, it's paid-for and the whole thing is not redistributable. For Linspire solutions for Linux, the OS is redistributable but not the MP3 part. Fedora's basis is that it is contains freely redistributable stuff, and indeed I find being able to copy it around at will is important.

you are willing to meet the licensing terms of all the components you want to have, no one is allowed to combine them for you if any part is covered by the GPL and any other part has different restrictions.

These are completely separate areas in law. The GPL operates under Copyright law. But the work you have fully legitimate copyright to can easily violate dozens of patents, which is regulated by a completely separate body of patent law. Let's imagine your enduser view of the GPL making problems was solved. Say the GPL became BSD overnight. Still Redhat cannot bundle mp3 players due to patent law.

They would no longer be constrained by licensing to not add components with different redistribution restrictions. So they could bundle anything they want as long as the license requirements were met independently.

You mean: "Copyright licensing". Patentholders typically did it to make money, and won't license their patents for free usage unless there is a quid pro quo in the form of a patent crosslicense. So Fedora could not go on as it is even in that hypothetical situation where copyright licensing restrictions disappeared but it wanted to include patented software: it would have to charge like all the other solutions currently have to charge.

I have to say I noted the irony of your using Alan Cox's code in the networking stack to piss him off. Seems your complaints should be tempered by some recognition that a lot of work went into giving us this stuff for free. Without acknowledging the debt, your complaints sound like a teenager complaining about how unfair his life is, while he lives under a roof he doesn't have to pay for, eats food, wears clothes that are given to him.

Is there something unique about the linux kernel that should matter to me? It is a convenient place to run X, apache, sendmail, perl, nfs, java, firefox, openoffice, etc. and I use it because it has hijacked much driver and kernel development that might have gone into the *bsd's otherwise. But I'll turn your comment around and point out that Linux

But your complaints centre on Linux and the GPL.

wouldn't exist without the design and specification of the original proprietary version of unix, and those other applications wouldn't exist without their original proprietary host OS's and in many cases their own proprietary versions. If you are going to pay homage to the development

You should turn it around a little further: Linux wouldn't exist as it is without the GPL, because the same set of contributors and the same ecosystem would not have formed. When you compose your complaints about the downstream effects of the GPL limiting what can be bundled, you should consider effect #0: it gave you the thing in the first place.

cycle, you should point out the irony of the self-serving GPL exception
allowing linkage with proprietary libraries of operating systems that it happens to need to run and initially couldn't have existed without, yet denying distribution with other binary-only components. What's that about acknowledging debt? Meanwhile I still buy copies of Windows and OS X for my machines because Linux distributions don't (and perhaps can't ever) include components to do all of the equivalent things.

People did a lot of work and gave you the result for free so you would have something to complain about. That is what should be acknowledged. It doesn't mean falling to your knees and weeping. But instead of acknowledging it, which should be easy enough since the evidence is all around you, you find yourself reaching into the GPL and picking out a specific feature of the license to complain about in response instead[1]. Your point is that this license feature means they didn't do all that work and give it to you for free? No, it means you have a problem acknowledging that you are the recipient of their kindness, because doing so puts the complaints in a different, more holistic light.

I have to use XP in vmware for one program myself, it doesn't invalidate the great work in Linux that works in every other area of my computer use, in fact having to go in there reminds me how great it all is. Use Linux where it makes sense and does a good job, by all means use other stuff when you have to. Don't try to bend Linux and Fedora out of the shape of what they are to fit all cases.

How is this going to change? I expect encodings to continue to improve and for people to continue to need a way to fund the development work. The GPL just doesn't provide a good model to fairly share those costs and it doesn't co-exist well with the schemes that do.

Yeah that's actually right IMO. About a year ago I had the same argument with ESR. Proprietary software -- proprietary in the copyright sense -- is given meaning and a lease of life by proprietary codecs -- proprietary in the patent sense. The two are symbiotic because they can share revenue. The FOSS "niche" is everywhere else.

Because of great patent-free codecs like Matroska and Vorbis we are not locked out of participating in audio and video, but the content rightsholders, by their choice of patent-protected codings, can and will lock us out of being able to offer their content.

Yes, content is what matters, so those codecs become important when/if the content you want is available in that encoding. Until the content vendors give up on DRM by finding out it doesn't sell, that's probably not going to happen.

Yeah, although there are signs EMI in financial desperation may be preparing to push the MP3 button, not that it helps us much as we discussed. The best answer is not to buy content that is restrictively licensed. http://jamendo.com will work with Fedora out of the box, with CC licensed music in OGG Vorbis format. If you encourage that stuff with your money instead you are doing something to reward people for being open and trusting and punishing the closed people that will jump at the chance to sue you.

And despite ESR's naive hopes of getting rescued by Linspire, there is nothing that can be done about it from this side going on. And who to blame? Patent law.

I agree that we'd be better off if software were recognized as math and not eligible for patents, but the mere existence of a patent doesn't mean that the terms of licensing have to be unreasonable or that the license can't be arranged and aggregated by a distributor. However vendor-provided binary drivers are a more immediate issue relating specifically to Linux. The mp3 discussion was just a sidetrack since it's all application level and can be done without inheriting any GPL restrictions.

In practice it does typically mean that unless the patent is used in crosslicensing horsetrading, it won't be granted in a redistributable way for $0: because then why bother with a patent. So patents inherently stand against free and freely redistributable software like Fedora, GPL or no GPL. The content rightsholders that will leverage that by patented codec choice stand against it too: why reward that with your money.

-Andy

[1] Have you met my ex-?

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux