Re: Fedora - DELL ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andy Green wrote:

This problem: ''It's Linux that brings a problem into this picture.'' Mentioned after your noting that Dells ship with MP3 and WMA and "It's Linux that brings a problem into this picture.". The reason Linux distros don't ship with that support is patents. I hope that clears up your sudden attack of 'confusion'.

No, it doesn't clear it up, given that other operating systems are able to arrange distribution with patented components. I'm not insisting that this combination be free, just available.

you are willing to meet the licensing terms of all the components you want to have, no one is allowed to combine them for you if any part is covered by the GPL and any other part has different restrictions.

These are completely separate areas in law. The GPL operates under Copyright law. But the work you have fully legitimate copyright to can easily violate dozens of patents, which is regulated by a completely separate body of patent law. Let's imagine your enduser view of the GPL making problems was solved. Say the GPL became BSD overnight. Still Redhat cannot bundle mp3 players due to patent law.

They would no longer be constrained by licensing to not add components with different redistribution restrictions. So they could bundle anything they want as long as the license requirements were met independently.

I have to say I noted the irony of your using Alan Cox's code in the networking stack to piss him off. Seems your complaints should be tempered by some recognition that a lot of work went into giving us this stuff for free. Without acknowledging the debt, your complaints sound like a teenager complaining about how unfair his life is, while he lives under a roof he doesn't have to pay for, eats food, wears clothes that are given to him.

Is there something unique about the linux kernel that should matter to me? It is a convenient place to run X, apache, sendmail, perl, nfs, java, firefox, openoffice, etc. and I use it because it has hijacked much driver and kernel development that might have gone into the *bsd's otherwise. But I'll turn your comment around and point out that Linux wouldn't exist without the design and specification of the original proprietary version of unix, and those other applications wouldn't exist without their original proprietary host OS's and in many cases their own proprietary versions. If you are going to pay homage to the development cycle, you should point out the irony of the self-serving GPL exception allowing linkage with proprietary libraries of operating systems that it happens to need to run and initially couldn't have existed without, yet denying distribution with other binary-only components. What's that about acknowledging debt? Meanwhile I still buy copies of Windows and OS X for my machines because Linux distributions don't (and perhaps can't ever) include components to do all of the equivalent things.

How is this going to change? I expect encodings to continue to improve and for people to continue to need a way to fund the development work. The GPL just doesn't provide a good model to fairly share those costs and it doesn't co-exist well with the schemes that do.

Yeah that's actually right IMO. About a year ago I had the same argument with ESR. Proprietary software -- proprietary in the copyright sense -- is given meaning and a lease of life by proprietary codecs -- proprietary in the patent sense. The two are symbiotic because they can share revenue. The FOSS "niche" is everywhere else.

Because of great patent-free codecs like Matroska and Vorbis we are not locked out of participating in audio and video, but the content rightsholders, by their choice of patent-protected codings, can and will lock us out of being able to offer their content.

Yes, content is what matters, so those codecs become important when/if the content you want is available in that encoding. Until the content vendors give up on DRM by finding out it doesn't sell, that's probably not going to happen.

And despite ESR's naive hopes of getting rescued by Linspire, there is nothing that can be done about it from this side going on. And who to blame? Patent law.

I agree that we'd be better off if software were recognized as math and not eligible for patents, but the mere existence of a patent doesn't mean that the terms of licensing have to be unreasonable or that the license can't be arranged and aggregated by a distributor. However vendor-provided binary drivers are a more immediate issue relating specifically to Linux. The mp3 discussion was just a sidetrack since it's all application level and can be done without inheriting any GPL restrictions.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux