On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 10:11 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > Gilboa Davara wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 08:28 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > >> I enjoy the myth of calling Fedora a community driven project. It is a > >> project driven by the people who run Fedora. I have yet to see any > >> suggestion made by the Fedora list community accepted by Fedora > >> developers, but I am not on the fedora-developers list so I may have > >> missed it. It was Fedora that has failed me by giving me the FC6 > >> distribution that exhibits problems not found on any other previous > >> Fedora or Red Hat distribution. It is annoying to take 5 months to > >> figure out how to deal with the problems of a distribution that is > >> created anew every 6 or 7 months. But I admit it is educational. > > > > Ignoring for a second the obvious flame-bait, if "Fedora" "failed you" > > and the term "community driven" is a "myth" - why are you using it? Why > > are you posting here? > > If people don't report their experiences, how can anyone improve them? > Or was your post just to confirm his observation that posting here isn't > likely to change anything? > How doesn't venting/spamming/claiming that "Fedora failed him" changes anything? (beyond venting). Did he post a question? Was he looking for help? Did he post a BZ# number, asking if anyone noticed the same problem? Beyond essentially calling Fedora a failure (failing to meet his expectations) - has he offered any solution? A new of following and fixing bugs? Until he does - this thread should be classified as "-5 flame-bait". - Gilboa
