Re: Ubuntu founder doesn't "get" enterprise Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 22:36 +0000, Alan wrote:
> > I thought when RHEL started there was a matter of some its binaries not
> > being distributable because they were proprietary. 
> 
> The RHEL package includes some bundled applications from other vendors
> that are proprietary (Java interpreters, media players that kind of
> thing), separate to the OS itself. They are not required as part of the
> system.
> 
> Alan
Well if these bundled applications are what you get when you buy RHEL
than I would say the distribution is in some sense closed. Whether they
are required for the system to run seems irrelevant. They are part of
RHEL. Or am I not understanding what you are saying?
-- 
Aaron Konstam <akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux