On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 09:53 -0500, taharka wrote: > OK, that's not really true. Mark is a sharp guy, and gets open source as > well, indeed, better, than most. But he's completely wrong on his > criticism of Red Hat (which Greg of the Fedora Project shoots down). His > basic point? Because RHEL is a closed binary, it's proprietary. > > Full article at, > http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/01/ubuntu_founder.html > > taharka Going through my Fedora folder, I came back across this one. I have never understood the comment. How is RHEL a "closed binary"? I'm having a time making sense of that statement. No biggie, just curious as heck. Ric -- ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar http://www.wayward4now.net ================================================
