Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Jul 30, 2014 2:24 PM, "Andreas Tille" <andreas@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > First I don't use Debian for years, so I don't know how you deal with it. > But anyway I think your effect is helpful at least. You'd find tophat as <https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tophat>. Search at <http://packages.debian.org/> if you don't know the exact name. > Second, I didn't submit it to the review queue because in the past seqan > was not available in Fedora until recent review from Antonio. Thus I > bundled seqan in the package. If I push it to Fedora, I need to unbundle it > and in this morning I failed because of the too new seqan. I pointed that out on the review. We definitely need to avoid duplication. I seem to remember there's a wiki page where work in progress could be recorded. > And bowtie2 is still not packaged as well, although it's not a must have > dep so far. I should prod Adam if he's still interested enough to do the work and isn't listening <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790629> > I'd like wait for a while until upstream has fixed it. I built it here against my version of seqan-1.4, but that failed to build in copr, which I can't deal with now. I haven't ported the official seqan to EPEL6 yet. I'll revisit this stuff in 10 days or more. _______________________________________________ scitech mailing list scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/scitech
