---------------------------------------- > Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:44:33 +0200 > From: jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: seb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > CC: scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Broken dependencies: Ray > > On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 08:33:20 -0500 > Sébastien Boisvert <seb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Ray has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: >>>>> On x86_64: >>>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.x86_64 requires libmpichcxx.so.10()(64bit) >>>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.x86_64 requires libmpich.so.10()(64bit) >>>>> On i386: >>>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.i686 requires libmpichcxx.so.10 >>>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.i686 requires libmpich.so.10 >>>>> On armhfp: >>>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libmpichcxx.so.10 >>>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libmpich.so.10 >>>>> Please resolve this as soon as possible. >>> >>> No, this is because mpich has had an unannounced soname bump once >>> again. Soname bumps break requirements, so all dependent packages have >>> to be rebuilt. >>> >> >> I see. Do I need to change Ray's spec file ? > > No, a rebuild is enough. Which you already did > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6561314 I am still getting automated emails telling me about Broken dependencies. Should I worry about that ? > -- > Susi Lehtola > Fedora Project Contributor > jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ scitech mailing list scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/scitech
