Re: Broken dependencies: Ray

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:57:04 +0200
> From: jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: seb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Broken dependencies: Ray
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:42:00 -0500
> Sébastien Boisvert <seb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> I see. Do I need to change Ray's spec file ?
>>> No, a rebuild is enough. Which you already did
>> I am still getting automated emails telling me about Broken dependencies.
>> Should I worry about that ?
> Actually, that rebuild was from September, and the one you did just now
> was just a scratch build...

When I try to do the rawhide build, it tells me that it has already been

[seb@localhost Ray]$ fedpkg build 
Could not execute build: Ray-2.1.0-8.fc21 has already been built

> So yes, a rebuild is still necessary. At least some of my packages have
> been rebuilt by the mpich maintainer.
> I'm still wondering about the dead silence on the devel list about
> this. Soname bumps should be preannounced.
> --
> Susi Lehtola
> Fedora Project Contributor
> jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 		 	   		  
scitech mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux