Re: Broken dependencies: Ray

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:44:33 +0200
> From: jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: seb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: scitech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Broken dependencies: Ray
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 08:33:20 -0500
> Sébastien Boisvert <seb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Ray has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
>>>>> On x86_64:
>>>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.x86_64 requires
>>>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.x86_64 requires
>>>>> On i386:
>>>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.i686 requires
>>>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.i686 requires
>>>>> On armhfp:
>>>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.armv7hl requires
>>>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.armv7hl requires
>>>>> Please resolve this as soon as possible.
>>> No, this is because mpich has had an unannounced soname bump once
>>> again. Soname bumps break requirements, so all dependent packages have
>>> to be rebuilt.
>> I see. Do I need to change Ray's spec file ?
> No, a rebuild is enough. Which you already did


Thank you for your guidance.

> --
> Susi Lehtola
> Fedora Project Contributor
> jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 		 	   		  
scitech mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Deep Creek Hot Springs]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux