Hi all,
I've started the process of cleaning up my ROS Fuerte packages and
submitting them for review. Currently, the following are posted (in
rough build order:)
rospack: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927458
ros: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927461
roscpp_core: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927462
python-genmsg: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927470
python-gencpp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927473
python-genlisp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927475
python-genpy: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927478
Please have a look and let me know if you have any comments or
suggestions (especially on package naming.) I'm still not sure if these
names are too generic or not. Where applicable, each package Provides:
ros-%{packagename} as well, and those are the names I'm using when
another package Requires: them.
The next package I'm working (std_msgs) has a really generic name, I
think I'm going to call it ros-std_msgs before I put it up. I know the
packaging guidelines discourage using underscores in package names, but
I think since that's what upstream is using that it's ok (if I'm reading
that guideline right)
I'll work on getting the rest of the packages up in the coming days.
Rich
_______________________________________________
robotics mailing list
robotics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/robotics
