https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972256 Pete Travis <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA CC| |docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject | |.org, me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Assignee|relnotes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flags| |needinfo?(docs-qa@xxxxxxxxx | |oraproject.org) --- Comment #1 from Pete Travis <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- First, I want to say that I do appreciate your review and your persistence. There were some embarrassing grammatical faults that might have been missed without you. I do want to be clear, however: I'm not going to replace every instance of 'on' in the text. Translators and users understand the usage of the word 'on' in contexts other than vertical proximity. Your drawing attention to it does make it seem used excessively, and I'll keep it in mind with future work. Many of your suggestions appeared to request rephrasing based on personal preference, often to the detriment of the technical accuracy of the copy. However, the review was useful in identifying unclear passages, even if it was not applied verbatim. Here's what I changed: The sentences about syslinux were confusing, and should read better now. Corrected the spelling error of "Performace" Co-Pilot Added the 'to' in the crtools section. Added a 'from' to the node.js docs package sentence Frankly, I'm a little surprised that you're requesting formal acknowledgement. Bug reporters, while vital to the open source community, are not typically listed as upstream contributors. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. -- relnotes-content mailing list relnotes-content@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/relnotes-content
