> It has nothing to do with your specific question, but there may be > another reason to pull roundcubemail from EPEL-4: it requires PHP5 since > version 0.2. > > I didn't have a look at the packages, but here you go... Given that 0.2 fixes some XSS issues, I think that's wise. Thanks! > Steven > > On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 14:42 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> Any suggestions, anyone? Am I better off just pulling roundcubemail >> from >> EL-4? >> >> ---------------------------- Original Message >> ---------------------------- >> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-07-13] >> From: "Joe Orton" <jorton@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Mon, July 14, 2008 1:40 pm >> To: "Jon Ciesla" <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:30:35AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> > >> > > php-pear is a subpackage of php in (base) RHEL4. Not sure what your >> exact question is, so I can't tell whether that's the right answer :) >> > > >> > > joe >> > > >> > Essentially, when I try to build php-pear-Mail-Mime in EPEL-4, mock >> fails with: >> > ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for php-pear >= >> 1:1.4.11-1.el4s1.1. Exiting. >> > >> > php-pear is at least 4.3.9. Why would this happen? >> >> 4.3.9 at epoch 0 is less than 1.4.11 at epoch 1. >> >> I've no idea whether the Fedora-style PEAR packages will work with the >> RHEL4 php-pear, in any case. I'd suggest you bring this up on >> fedora-php-devel-list. >> >> joe >> >> >> -- >> novus ordo absurdum >> >> >> > -- novus ordo absurdum _______________________________________________ Fedora-php-devel-list mailing list Fedora-php-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-php-devel-list
