On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Neville A. Cross <neville@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think that news mailing list is not the best stage to voice this > opinion. I think that will be better to voice it over the ambassadors > mailing list. Anyway, you got Larry's attention and mine too. Would you > mind to take a few minutes of your time and talk about this on the opne > floor that happens on every famsco meeting, as you are making a request > I think will be good to have it explained on how you wish to view > expressed the work of famsco. I find Larry's conclusion very unbecoming and uncivil especially from a FAmSCo member (I'll stop rating it as being snarky). At no point was it meant to be criticism unless you want it interpret it that way. I'll give a current example - please look at the FAmSCo meeting agenda page for the meeting I reported on the beat - that has both meeting points and action items mixed up. It makes for difficult reporting. I just passed a remark that I wished such a think could be looked from the aspect that there are folks writing beats based on that content. If you follow this list you'll note that from time to time I make an observation after I post an update status of my beat. In the past I have had blog posts about the parts FAmSCo could take a look at. And at no point in those post was the current and past FAmSCo members being dissed about. I am copying the FAmSCo list in the thread as the news list isn't the place for a discussion. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog> _______________________________________________ news mailing list news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/news
