Re: Following up with beat writers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:10:01 +0200 (CEST), "Max Spevack"
<mspevack@xxxxxxxxxx> said:

> An empty beat should not be included in the final issue, IMHO.  Part of 
> the process of moving from the Overview Page to the IssueXYZ page is to 
> cull un-written beats.
> 
> Here's how I'd use the beats table:
> 
> 1) as soon as an issue is released, an editor-type changes the date to 
> the next deadline day, and marks every beat as "INCOMPLETE".
> 
> 2) Beats that don't have a writer are marked as "NO WRITER".
> 
> 3) Beats that have a writer but aren't happening that week, for whatever 
> reason, are marked as "NOT HAPPENING".
> 
> 4) Beats that are in progress are marked "IN PROGRESS".
> 
> 5) Beats that are finished are marked "COMPLETE" along with a note to 
> list.

That sounds eminently sensible to me.  If there are no objections on
list from anyone in a couple of days then I'll update the workflow with
above.
-- 
  Oisin Feeley
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OisinFeeley

_______________________________________________
Fedora-news-list mailing list
Fedora-news-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Wildlife]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux