On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 14:48 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Gilboa Davara wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 11:26 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >> On Thursday 23 August 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >>> On Thursday 23 August 2007, Matthias Saou wrote: > >>>> Ville Skyttä wrote : > >>>>> No objections. In fact, the exact same thing applies to the > >>>>> gkrellm-themes package, and I plan to invoke the same process for it. > >>>> I don't use the xmms-skins anymore, but I definitely still use gkrellm, > >>>> and always cycle through all the themes when I change desktop > >>>> background, so I'd really like to see them stay. > >>>> > >>>> I'll try to have a look at gkrellm-themes and see if at least a few can > >>>> be kept, then add some more from there little by little once licenses > >>>> get added or clarified. > >>> Go ahead and assign the package yourself if you like. There are a couple > >>> of skins that do have some copyright notices included, and if you're > >>> inclined to look for more, I wouldn't mind it if ShinyMetal-Blue would stay > >>> ;) > >> I did not hear back, so I have orphaned gkrellm-themes. Unless someone takes > >> maintainership by let's say next Friday, will EOL it and ask for removal from > >> F8. > > > > Speaking of which, who's the maintainer of gkrellm? > > > > That would be me, but I fail to see how that is relevant, Sorry. I should have marked my question with a visible OT. Just wanted to point out that gkrellm 2.3 is out ;) Sorry for the miss-understanding, - Gilboa -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
