On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 15:22 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > Thanks for scaring the bejesus out of me. > > What's the going practice when license is unknown? > > Ideally we should clarify licensing information asap or stop distribution. > > > ... Plus, can I take my sweet time checking it or is it required by > > F8-release? > > We would be in trouble even today if any authors questions us on > distributing their content without any written rights to do so. > Considering the amount of work required to clarify such licensing > details across so many themes, you should probably let the package get > orphaned and import it later when the licensing details are clarified > which you might consider doing along with other distribution maintainers > or strip down the package immediately to themes with clear licenses and > add more continuously when you get the licenses sorted out. > > Rahul OK. Did anyone contact gkrellm.org? - Gilboa -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
