On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:48:34PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:22:14 -0400, Luke Macken wrote: > > > > Enrico has had trouble before inside Bodhi, the updates system, with > > > other packages. It wouldn't surprise me if he's unhappy with the extra > > > burden and waits for a convenient "make release" or similar. > > > > He hasn't reported any problems upstream, nor has he made the effort to > > comment on any of his updates regarding said issues. Many people have > > given feedback on his updates, and he receives an email for each one. > > If he is unhappy with the burden of being a maintainer, we need to > > figure out why so we can address it properly, and possibly find a > > co-maintainer willing to utilize our existing tools while we resolve the > > problem. > > Let me suggest the following: somebody from FESCo talks to Enrico and > other packagers, whose F7 updates are missing for a long time > according to the "EVR problems" report, to find out whether there are > any problems with the work-flow and hurdles. It belongs to the "make > sure we don't suck" area of activity. Missing updates, missing security > updates, upgrade problems and unresolved dependency problems make Fedora > look bad. Sounds like a plan. I'll try and generate a list of maintainers who haven't touched bodhi, or haven't been able to accomplish anything productive with it yet. luke -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
