Re: tor security updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:48:34PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:22:14 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> 
> > > Enrico has had trouble before inside Bodhi, the updates system, with
> > > other packages. It wouldn't surprise me if he's unhappy with the extra
> > > burden and waits for a convenient "make release" or similar.
> > 
> > He hasn't reported any problems upstream, nor has he made the effort to
> > comment on any of his updates regarding said issues.  Many people have
> > given feedback on his updates, and he receives an email for each one.
> > If he is unhappy with the burden of being a maintainer, we need to
> > figure out why so we can address it properly, and possibly find a
> > co-maintainer willing to utilize our existing tools while we resolve the
> > problem.
> 
> Let me suggest the following: somebody from FESCo talks to Enrico and
> other packagers, whose F7 updates are missing for a long time
> according to the "EVR problems" report, to find out whether there are
> any problems with the work-flow and hurdles. It belongs to the "make
> sure we don't suck" area of activity. Missing updates, missing security
> updates, upgrade problems and unresolved dependency problems make Fedora
> look bad.

Sounds like a plan.  I'll try and generate a list of maintainers who
haven't touched bodhi, or haven't been able to accomplish anything
productive with it yet.

luke

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux