On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:36:36 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:08:20 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> >
> >> Someone asked on fedora-list about updates to tor which fix some
> >> security issues. The version in F7 is 0.1.2.13, while the latest
> >> upstream is 0.1.2.16. Looking in Koji, 0.1.2.1{4,5,6} have all
> >> been built (with 0.1.2.16 having been built on August 2*), yet all
> >> of them are in the pending state still. Does anyone know the
> >> reason they're not being pushed to updates-testing?
> >>
> >> * successfully for F7, but failed for rawhide with what looks like
> >> one of the "open_missing_mode" errors.
> >
> > Have you pushed them using Bodhi, the "Fedora Updates System"?
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
>
> I'm not the maintainer, Enrico Scholz is. So we'd have to ask him
> that. (I'm also not a tor user, I was just made curious when I looked
> into it to try and answer the question on fedora-list.) It definitely
> seems odd that the packages were built quite quickly after the
> upstream releases were made and then left to sit in the pending state
> for so long.
>
> For the reference of others, here are the relevant links to Bodhi and
> Koji:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4002
Enrico has had trouble before inside Bodhi, the updates system, with
other packages. It wouldn't surprise me if he's unhappy with the extra
burden and waits for a convenient "make release" or similar.
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
