Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 15:08:20 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
>> Someone asked on fedora-list about updates to tor which fix some
>> security issues. The version in F7 is 0.1.2.13, while the latest
>> upstream is 0.1.2.16. Looking in Koji, 0.1.2.1{4,5,6} have all
>> been built (with 0.1.2.16 having been built on August 2*), yet all
>> of them are in the pending state still. Does anyone know the
>> reason they're not being pushed to updates-testing?
>>
>> * successfully for F7, but failed for rawhide with what looks like
>> one of the "open_missing_mode" errors.
>
> Have you pushed them using Bodhi, the "Fedora Updates System"?
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
I'm not the maintainer, Enrico Scholz is. So we'd have to ask him
that. (I'm also not a tor user, I was just made curious when I looked
into it to try and answer the question on fedora-list.) It definitely
seems odd that the packages were built quite quickly after the
upstream releases were made and then left to sit in the pending state
for so long.
For the reference of others, here are the relevant links to Bodhi and
Koji:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4002
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chemistry is applied theology.
-- Augustus Owsley Stanley
Attachment:
pgpYGUgsBDlr3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
