-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 If a package has API Documentation extracted from source via doxygen, gtk-doc, or similar, can the documentation have a separate license from the code-source? In the particular case I'm looking at (qof) the source is currently under the GPLv2+ and the doxygen main page lists GFDL as the license for the documentation. The code in question has multiple contributors but I don't know whether the inline documentation was all created by a single person (who could dual license) or not. I can ask if that's important but would like to understand whether I need to or not first. - -Toshio -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGx2RnX6yAic2E7kgRAtLDAKCZ/VDFKl0uZv0JqJbkhIZli6RTJQCfbdGQ cgjwn/CpHOgq9sksVt1YgA8= =iete -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
