On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 14:28 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > If a package has API Documentation extracted from source via doxygen, > gtk-doc, or similar, can the documentation have a separate license from > the code-source? In the particular case I'm looking at (qof) the source > is currently under the GPLv2+ and the doxygen main page lists GFDL as > the license for the documentation. The code in question has multiple > contributors but I don't know whether the inline documentation was all > created by a single person (who could dual license) or not. I can ask > if that's important but would like to understand whether I need to or > not first. GFDL and GPL are compatible licenses, so I'm going to say this is ok. ~spot -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
