-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > >> GFDL and GPL are compatible licenses, so I'm going to say this is ok. >> > > They are not. GNU FDL can have invariant sections for example. In this particular case, the license is:: Permission is granted to copy, distribute, and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts. - -Toshio -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGx3HpX6yAic2E7kgRAtZ0AKCeeZdi0ASvzQ5XBWy9x9xDXBs7cQCfah6f DeiLqETDaT2WZXw7GHpc368= =DCQq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
