On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 11:08 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 10:58 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 10:59 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > /me imagines an angry author shouting at C violation by Fedora because > > > we mark something GPL+ instead of GPLv2+ or GPLv3+ > > > > Agreed. Asking upstream is the best way to resolve that case. > > > > However, we're not liable for any mistaken tagging of the License in our > > package, because the License: tag isn't legally binding. > > Yeah in fact I said shouting not taking legal action :-) Shouting I'm not worried about. People shout at me all day long. ;) ~spot -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
