On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 10:58 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 10:59 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > /me imagines an angry author shouting at C violation by Fedora because > > we mark something GPL+ instead of GPLv2+ or GPLv3+ > > Agreed. Asking upstream is the best way to resolve that case. > > However, we're not liable for any mistaken tagging of the License in our > package, because the License: tag isn't legally binding. Yeah in fact I said shouting not taking legal action :-) Simo. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
