On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 10:43 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:34:48 +0200 > Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What if the code only says "see COPYING ", is it then ok to use the > > version information from COPYING? > > I do believe that counts as documentation, and since unmodified COPYING > is basically GPL+ that would be your license. While this is strictly true I think the best action is to ask upstream to resolve the issue by explicitly stating their choice in a document. /me imagines an angry author shouting at C violation by Fedora because we mark something GPL+ instead of GPLv2+ or GPLv3+ -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
