On 08/07/2007 09:55 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 09:31 +0200, Oliver Falk wrote: >> Hi David! >> >> On 08/07/2007 09:26 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: >>> I think that's perhaps a little harsh in some cases. Take the blocker >>> in Ralf's case, for example -- ocaml. I wouldn't necessarily expect a >>> package maintainer to be willing and able to port its code generation >>> back end to any new architecture which we happen to add to Fedora; >>> that really is the job of the 'arch team'. >> [ ... ] >> >> I also see problems compiling ocaml on Alpha - maybe you can tell me >> your progress on that? > > I haven't looked at it. What's the problem? > > I know ocaml is working fine on ppc, and mostly OK on ppc64 (where > 'mostly' means the compiler itself and most test programs seem to run, > although freetennis segfaults after startup. Which is why it isn't in > the build system yet). It looks like it ought to have Alpha support too. ok. understood, that ppc also has problems with ocaml - but compile problems... i'll try to rebuild it again and let you know - maybe you can help me out. :-) thx, -of -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
