On Monday 25 June 2007 13:01:59 Jochen Schmitt wrote: > If you implement any mechanism to block an update, that is ok from my > side. but I think > is not good, if an update will promote to a higher stage without the > explicit permission > of the maintainer which is responsible for it. I think the gameplan is that the maintainer would have to manually request the autotimeout at update submission time. It wouldn't be pre-set. But again, that's a detail to work out. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpILJRXcyqPl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
