On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 11:36 -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > It may make sense to say that only the package owner(s) can push updates > > to the public, but just committing and building should be unrestricted. > > I think this is another case where too much regulation hurts us. The > policy shouldn't be "other people can't do it". It should be "act > responsibly." Every once in a while, some package maintainer might have > good cause to modify somebody else's package and push it. Usually, it > won't be the case. If there's a good reason. Indeed. > I also think your (later) comment on irc was more correct than your > comment here -- if you're not the maintainer, you should be able to > change things and even build. But you shouldn't be able to push to > repos. The maintainer (or rel-eng) need to do that part. Perhaps not 'more correct', but just 'more coherent'. I think that's actually what I was trying to say. -- dwmw2 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
