Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 10:17 -0500, Jima wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Hans de Goede wrote:
I invite everyone else who never felt the need for ACL's to join me,
and hereby declare this day ACL removal day.
Hmm, good idea. You're also raising awareness; I hadn't even
noticed that my two newest packages *had* pkg.acl files, which I'm
now remedying.
Suggestion for FESCO: new packages must explicitly request an ACL.
I would go further. Even for existing packages, package maintainers must
specify good reasons for retaining ACL's and that must be documented
explicitly in some prominent place.
Does this include all packages like core packages like the kernel, setup
and such? Things that are crucial to the stability of the system?
steved.
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
