On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:24:53AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 13 June 2007 08:34:32 Axel Thimm wrote: > > I'm not referring to the fixed koji bug, but the ExclusiveArch > > abuse. Semantically wrong field to embed this information, and this > > information doesn't belong into specfiles or rpm headers anyway. > > > > But let's first get settled with the new tools and suggest > > improvements later (not that plague did better in this respect). > > Koji doesn't use this anymore. Koji uses a field in the entry for that > package in the database to list the "extra arches" a package should build > for. That triggers koji to issue multiple builds of the package when the > request comes in, one for each arch listed. Using ExclusiveArch was an > attempt at doing away from this manual configuration per package with Extra > arches and rely upon information provided by the spec, but it had undesired > side-effects. That's wonderful news! If you would also pass over how this is being taught to koji you'd make my day. :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpDqIkitlKJT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
