Re: gprolog i386,i486,i586,i686 rpms?!?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 13 June 2007 08:34:32 Axel Thimm wrote:
> I'm not referring to the fixed koji bug, but the ExclusiveArch
> abuse. Semantically wrong field to embed this information, and this
> information doesn't belong into specfiles or rpm headers anyway.
>
> But let's first get settled with the new tools and suggest
> improvements later (not that plague did better in this respect).

Koji doesn't use this anymore.  Koji uses a field in the entry for that 
package in the database to list the "extra arches" a package should build 
for.  That triggers koji to issue multiple builds of the package when the 
request comes in, one for each arch listed.  Using ExclusiveArch was an 
attempt at doing away from this manual configuration per package with Extra 
arches and rely upon information provided by the spec, but it had undesired 
side-effects.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpcnudTyKF6v.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux