On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 07:26:08AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:08:20PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> >> gprolog.spec includes:
> >> ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}
> >> and koji at one time expanded this to build for *all* of those archs.
> >> That koji bug has been fixed since.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Anyway ATM I wouldn't dare suggest a better alternative, let the dust
> > settle first ;)
>
> The dust *has* settled, though that doesn't help with already built, biffed
> packages.
I'm not referring to the fixed koji bug, but the ExclusiveArch
abuse. Semantically wrong field to embed this information, and this
information doesn't belong into specfiles or rpm headers anyway.
But let's first get settled with the new tools and suggest
improvements later (not that plague did better in this respect).
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpsSpAzkuBOe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
