On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 03:25:06PM -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 03:04:45PM -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > >>If folks were willing to be more MILITANT AND CONSISTENT in enforcing > >>the "devel only" rules for fedora-devel-list I might be happier about > >>killing fedora-maintainers. But consistent enforcement has proven to be > >>impossible to maintain in the past. > > > >Isn't it the case? I don't see many wrong posts here. > > > > by "here" do you mean fedora-maintainers? > > If so, the signal to noise ratio here is good, because we are selective > about who we allow on this list. No, I am speaking about fedora-devel. I don't see a lot of noise, most posts are development related. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
